10 January 1819: Haydon, Moulting, Stalled Hyperion, & a Sequestered Sister
Wentworth Place, Hampstead: a double-house where Keats, aged 23, has lived with Charles Brown since early December 1818, almost immediately after the death of his younger brother, Tom, of consumption.
What also concerns Keats at this time is the restricted contact he has with his younger
sister, Fanny, orchestrated by the family
guardian, Richard Abbey. Abbey even objects to
Keats writing to his sister, which bothers Keats considerably (letters, 16 Jan and
11 Feb
1819). To his brother George and wife Georgiana in America, he writes that Abbey has
quite shut [Fanny] out from me
(14 Feb).
In an exchange of letters with his friend and great supporter, the painter Benjamin Robert Haydon, Keats confirms that he will give Haydon
an interest-free loan, though Keats is himself strapped for cash, and living off dwindling
credit based on inheritance money. Haydon becomes overly and annoyingly persistent
in asking
Keats for financial assistance. Haydon (nine years Keats’s senior) has fallen on hard
times,
with some vision problems as he attempts to complete a large, complex, historical
painting.
Keats tells Haydon he is a little unhappy about procuring the Money,
since it involves
the ordeal
of going to town more than a couple of times and standing at the Bank
[for] an hour or two
—it is, Keats suggests, a torment worse than Dante’s circles of hell
(10 Jan). He has a point.
Haydon, throughout much of his relationship with Keats, passionately encourages Keats’s poetic development by offering brotherly affection. Haydon, too, importantly pushes Keats to avoid Leigh Hunt’s sway (Hunt unofficially mentors and promotes the young Keats beginning late fall, 1816). By 1819, Haydon is less important for Keats, but Keats remains mainly loyal to him. One of Keats’s most mature characteristics is to accept friends while being aware of their faults; Haydon had many.
Haydon paints Keats into his epic (in terms of the time taken to complete it, too!) canvas, Christ’s Triumphant Entry into Jerusalem. In mid-December 1816, Haydon also makes a life-mask of Keats, which must have been a moment of stirring pride for Keats, since, the year before, Haydon had also made a life-mask of William Wordsworth, arguably the most important poet of the age.
Importantly, in this letter of 10 January (which Keats signs off, Your’s for ever
),
Keats perceives some slow but sure way forward in his progress as a poet: I see by little
and little more of what is to be done, and how it is to be done should I ever be able
to do
it.
With some feeling he adds: On my Soul there should be some reward for that
continual ’agonie ennuiyeuse’ [tedious agony].
This is a fairly deliberate but tempered
statement of both struggle and poetic progress: Keats has come to see
the character of
great and enduring poetry, and his remarkable poetics point to how
he should do it.
In fact, Keats’s way forward will come more quickly than he thinks. With his efforts on the Hyperion poem stalled, he soon finds himself propelled by an evocative, atmospheric, and controlled romance, The Eve of St Agnes, drafted the last two weeks of January, and with the coming spring Keats’s progress is little short of astonishing.
Keats also writes to Haydon that lately he has
written little; he has been disconnected and as it were moulting.
Keats then adds that
his state will not take him to the rope or the Pistol
—that is, to suicide. Four days
later, attempting to cheer Keats up, Haydon tells Keats that what he feels is nothing
more
than the intense searching of a glorious spirit,
and that bye & bye
Keats
will shine through
the muddy world
(14 Jan). These are kind, encouraging words.
Knowing what we know, what Keats says about not contemplating suicide carries a minor
but dark
irony: Haydon, unfortunately, does commit suicide (in fact, a grizzly
suicide) years later, in June 1846. In the end, Haydon fails to achieve his larger
artistic goals and to convince the world of his own artistic worth (which he sadly
overestimates); he also had a way of affronting both patrons and the artistic establishment,
and of chronically gathering numerous creditors.
The moulting
metaphor is useful, given that Keats also uses it later in the year in a
letter to another close friend, John Hamilton
Reynolds, 11 July: I have of late been moulting.
But in this case, Keats
describes his change not into a bird or butterfly (he’s been there and done that),
but
something of the reverse: in fact, he is more grounded (sublunary
), more like a
Chrysalis
with little peepholes able to look out into the stage of the world.
This is a statement of maturity and poetic perspective; and given what he writes in
the first
half of 1819, this is indeed an accurate self-assessment of his progress—or the style
of his
progress. The Chrysalis with peepholes idea—that is, of seeing-and-not-being-seen—fits
with
his notion of the poetic character as unobtrusive and camelion-like.