24-25 March 1818: Nettles, Isabella, & Hunt’s Affectatious Title
Teignmouth, Devon

 
                     
                     
                     Keats writes to his good friend, the sensible and witty James Rice. Keats has been in Teignmouth for over two weeks; he stays for about two months. He joins his younger brother, Tom, who has clear signs of consumption. Keats’s hope is to put the final touches (corrections and a preface) on Endymion, the long poem on which he has been working fairly steadily for almost a year.
In the letter to Rice, Keats expresses, a little
                     playfully, a life-theme—a theory of Nettles.
 He posits that how happy
 one’s
                     thoughts might be if they could remain settled and content, with feelings quiet and
                        pleasant.
 But, he notes, Alas! This never can be.
 Mutability, complexity, and
                     darker, uncertain elements cannot be kept in check by any philosophy. At his most
                     penetrating
                     moments in his poetry-to-come, these elements will combine in an acceptance of uncertainty
                     and
                     sorrow through a capable imagination, one that equally embraces despondency and hope,
                     joy and
                     sorrow. 
After waggishly wondering if, in a world of non-varying atoms, the smart matter of
                     Milton’s head might find some room in someone else’s
                     empty head, he expresses hope for the health of his ill friend, John Hamilton Reynolds, and he notes Tom’s health, as well: Oh! for a day and all well!
 And
                     then, to perhaps raise spirits, Keats ends with a lusty doggerel based on visiting
                     a fair at
                     the town of Dawlish, Over the hill and over the
                           dale.
The next day, 25 March, Keats writes an offhand epistolary poem to Reynolds—Dear Reynolds, as last night I lay in
                           bed. The poem rambles forward by describing some recent disjointed dreams and
                     what such things might mean. By the poem’s end, he is unsettled about the tooth and
                     claw of
                     nature and the troubling moods of one’s mind
 (100-6). But most interestingly, in
                     between these, he accepts that reason and ethics can never be settled
 or
                     knowable—they will tease us out of thought
 (77); our happiness is sadly flawed
                     because we see beyond our bourne— / It forces us in summer skies to mourn: / It spoils the
                        singing of the nightingale.
 These lines, if only in passing, anticipate the region of
                     thought and source of great poetry that Keats comes to explore in his best work; they
                     especially anticipate his 1819 odes on the urn and the nightingale, where the human
                     condition
                     and time’s powers encounter each other through an unfaltering imagination. Even the
                     style of
                     these lines, in their simple, uncluttered, calm elegance, anticipate a voice that
                     Keats will,
                     for example, summon in his remarkable ode To Autumn, written in the fall of 1819. 
The letter to Reynolds also has a brief,
                     disconnected but charged comment about his friend and former mentor, Leigh Hunt, who, back in October 1816, more or less launches Keats’s
                     poetic career while introducing him into a network of writers, poets, publishers,
                     critics, and
                     artists. Keats writes, What affectation in Hunt’s title—‘Foliage’!
 The reference is to a collection of Hunt’s poetry. That Keats points
                     to Hunt’s poetic pretensions is yet another sign of his desire to move away from Hunt’s
                     influence and particular poetic style. Keats seems to feel some contempt for Hunt’s
                     mannered
                     poetic posturing. Keats, we know, has for one of his Axioms
 that poetry must come
                     naturally (rather than display artificiality) or better not come at all
 (27 Feb). Keats
                     clearly trusts Reynolds to keep these comments private, since Reynold knows Hunt very
                     well,
                     and Keats is still in contact with Hunt, having met and dined with him at least a
                     couple of
                     times the previous month. Worth keeping in mind is that only a year-and-a-half earlier
                     that
                     Keats is a great fan of Hunt as a poet. His comment mocking Hunt’s title is a measure
                     of how
                     far—and in what direction—Keats has come.
 
                     
                     
                     Among shorter and largely inconsequential poetry, Keats finishes Isabella. Based on Boccaccio’s tale and likely set off by William Hazlitt’s 3 February 1818 lecture, Keats
                     begins it in February and completes it by 27 April. The poem’s awkward combination
                     of
                     sentimentality, mild lewdness, and idealization is in some ways a sideways step in
                     Keats’s
                     poetic progress, inasmuch as its ostensible lack of purpose recalls earlier work.
                     Keats thus
                     later considers the poem mawkish
 (19 Sept 1819), weak, simple, and exhibiting too much
                     inexperience—and altogether too smokeable
 (22 Sept 1819), meaning that he considered
                     the poem easily open to mockery. He did not want it published, but it ends up in his
                     1820
                     volume. (Keats also calls his long poem Endymion mawkish
 in its style and
                     ambition.) 
Four things are notable in this period at Teignmouth: first, Keats finally able to
                     put Endymion and its shortcomings behind him; second, clear signs that
                     he wants to move forward through application, study, and thought
 (24 April); third, a
                     deliberate wrestling with the poetic dimensions of Milton and Wordsworth relative to
                     his own poetic character and goals; and fourth, and as an extension of this, further
                     work
                     toward a composed stance that will, in his poetry, allow him to reflect deeper regions
                     of
                     wisdom, knowledge, and feeling—that Burden of the Mystery
 he refers to twice (on 3 May)
                     in drawing upon Wordsworth’s phrase from Tintern Abbey (38). 


 
            